|
|
Our Activities
in FY2005-2006
Current Situation of North Korean Refugees
Annual
Report 2006
Activity Report – Fiscal Year 2005-2006
Pressure
on the North Korean government by the international community
is increasing thanks to greater international awareness of the
grave human rights abuses committed by the North Korean government,
in addition to the refugee and abductee issues. With
the passage of the UN Resolution on North Korean Human Rights,
the UN General
Assembly’s December 2005 North Korean Human
Rights Bill, the European Parliament public hearings on the North
Korean human rights issue, and Japan’s June 2006 North Korean
Human Rights Bill, the net is narrowing around the North Korean
regime.
The
North Korean government faces increasing criticism from the international
community over
its criminal activities, including
counterfeiting, money laundering, illegal tobacco production, and
the illegal export of stimulant drugs. In addition, although the
UN Security Council failed to impose sanctions in response to North
Korea’s missile launches, it did unanimously (including China
and Russia) pass a resolution criticizing North Korea, which has
highlighted that country’s isolation. The pattern of China
unwaveringly supporting North Korea, while Russia and South Korea
acquiesce, is beginning to falter.
Appealing,
however, to their common heritage as Koreans under
the misguided Sunshine Policy, South Korea and the Roh Moo-Hyun
administration argue that North Korea needs to be encouraged and
have been passive with regard to the protection and admittance
of North Korean refugees. The South Korean embassies in Laos and
Cambodia have thwarted NGOs working to protect North Korean refugees,
and have failed to fulfill their roles as diplomatic representative
offices.
In
Japan, this has been reflected by the two main associations of
ethnic Korean
residents
in the question of unity between the
two groups, as well as in the Mindan central branch leadership
elections. One group is the pro-Seoul Korean Residents Union in
Japan (Mindan), while the other group is the pro-Pyongyang General
Association of Korean Residents in Japan (Chongryun; sometimes
referred to as a branch office of the Workers’ Party of Korea).
In the elections, the pro-Seoul candidates were endorsed by the
South Korean ambassador to Japan and the consul-general, who also
pushed strongly for unity between the two residents’ groups.
This met with strong opposition from the Mindan membership and
was formally rejected, resulting in the resignation of the leadership.
Mindan’s
North Korean Support Center for North Korean Refugees was providing
humanitarian assistance to North Korean residents
of Japan who emigrated to North Korea and then returned to Japan
to settle. However, Mindan closed down the Support Center in the
face of strong opposition, causing a great deal of confusion and
anxiety for defectors who had already suffered many hardships in
North Korea.
China
still refuses to formally recognize the existence of North
Korean refugees. Consequently, there is no end in sight to the
forced repatriation of North Korean refugees and the tragedy it
brings. Despite being a signatory to the Refugee Convention, China
flagrantly denies the existence of North Korean refugees even as
it ignores the protests of the international community.
Those
working to provide protection and humanitarian assistance
to refugees from North Korea continue to be arrested in China.
Activity Report
I. |
North
Korean Refugees and Humanitarian Rescue Work
We addressed the problem of assisting, efficiently and
securely, as many North Korean refugees as possible. |
|
A. |
We
expanded our links to cooperate with groups and individuals
in Asia (South Korea, China, Laos, Thailand, and Myanmar);
in North America (the United States); in Europe (Britain,
France, Belgium, Germany, and Norway); and in Oceania (New
Zealand). |
|
B. |
We
effectively reported on human rights violations and human
trafficking at international conferences, symposia, and to
international lobby groups concerned with North Korean refugees
and human rights: |
|
|
• |
Spoke
at the European Parliament’s public hearing on North
Korean human rights issues; |
|
|
• |
Spoke
at the public hearing of the U.S. International Committee
on Religious Freedoms; |
|
|
• |
Spoke
at the U.S. Asia Society Symposium; |
|
|
• |
Participated
in the international conference co-hosted by the Rafto Foundation
(Norway) and the Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean
Human Rights (South Korea); |
|
|
• |
Participated
in the South Korean Christian Association Symposium; |
|
|
• |
Participated
in an information exchange with the Voice of Martyrs Christian
association (U.S.); |
|
|
• |
Participated
in the third International Conference on North Korean Refugees
and Human Rights (Mongolia). |
|
C. |
Assistance
to Humanitarian Workers |
|
|
• |
We
provided assistance to the family of Choi Yong-hun, who was
arrested and remains imprisoned for his attempt to help “the
boat people” in January 2003 in Shandong Yantai. We
also approached the Chinese and South Korean governments
regarding Choi’s release from prison in China. |
|
|
• |
We
provided assistance to Phillip Jun Buck, a Korean-American
pastor arrested on charges of helping North Koreans escape
via the Mongolian route. Buck was released from prison in
Yanji in August of this year and deported to Seattle, Washington
in the U.S. |
II. |
Protection
of North Korean Refugees |
|
A. |
Securing
and building shelters |
|
|
• |
Arranged
three shelters in the Yanbian Special Autonomous Zone. |
|
B. |
Procured
and distributed 500 sets of summer and winter clothes. |
|
C. |
Food
Distribution |
|
|
• |
Organized
the ability to distribute 40 tons annually of rice-based
foodstuffs. |
|
D. |
Provided
resettlement funds and help in returning safely, for refugees
expressing a desire to return to North Korea. Assisted approximately
20 such persons between January and March 2006. |
III. |
Medical
Assistance |
|
In
addition to providing medical assistance to refugees, we
assisted a defector who had been tortured in North Korea
and who required treatment in hospital. We also provided
80 home medical “first aid” kits. |
IV. |
Education
Sponsorship Plan |
|
The
arrest and forced repatriation of North Korean refugees in
China, as well as the detention and arrest of humanitarian
workers continue. The detention of the head of the JRL-01
shelter by the Chinese authorities so frightened the 16 children
living in the shelter that they dropped out of the education
sponsorship plan.
In
addition, some doubt arose that the head of the YAN-02
shelter was properly carrying out assigned duties. When
it was suggested that funding would be stopped, the children
were all released from the shelter. However, one of those
later managed to reach South Korea.
At
another shelter, one of the foster children was arrested
on the way home from school and forcibly repatriated.
In
summary, 18 foster children left the program, and two graduated
from LFNKR’s education sponsorship plan. Meanwhile,
eight new children were registered, and LFNKR’s education
sponsorship plan continues to provide assistance to 20
foster children. |
V. |
Food
Distribution |
|
We
distributed 30 tons of rice-based foodstuffs within our
shelters in China, and 10 tons of foodstuffs within North
Korea. Based on the statistics for the January-March period,
an average of 20 people per day (600 people per month)
sought food assistance at our shelters. Based on a 500-gram
daily ration of rice per adult, this comes to 30 tonnes,
at a cost of 1.44 million yen (about $12,308).
In
order for each person to purchase 10 kilograms of rice,
we have budgeted 20 RMB per person, up to a limit of 20
people per day, for a daily total of 400 RMB (6000 yen
or $51). This totals 180,000 yen per month, which is the
limit of LFNKR’s resources. |
VI. |
Immigration
and Settlement Assistance |
|
Our
priority is those who have fled North Korea and are unable
either to return to North Korea or to remain in China and
whose safety remains in jeopardy. We also assist North Korean
defectors to reach safety in third countries. |
|
A. |
Protection
through international organizations and diplomatic establishments
(for security reasons specific names and specific numbers
of refugees cannot be shown): |
|
|
• |
In
several cases, individuals were given protection
by the UNHCR; |
|
|
• |
In
a number of other cases individuals were provided protection
by the Japanese consulate; |
|
|
• |
Several
other individuals managed to reach safety through the
underground railroad. |
|
B. |
Resettlement
assistance within Japan: |
|
|
In
the past, we have worked to resettle defectors with the assistance
of the Mindan North Korean Support Center for Refugees. With
the election of the new Mindan head, however, the organization
has moved toward a policy of unity with Chongryun and thus
an acceptance of human rights violations, which has ended
our previously cooperative relationship. Repairing this relationship
of trust will not be a simple matter. |
|
C. |
Japanese-language
education: |
|
|
LFNKR
has provided its own Japanese-language classes to defectors;
those who have completed the course have enrolled in a
junior high school night program in order to receive a
comprehensive education as well as to improve their Japanese.
To
facilitate the resettlement of defectors, we have decided
to formalize the education process, incorporating both
Japanese-language courses, which serve as social education,
and the formal education system. |
VII. |
Expansion
and Development of Partnerships in Japan |
|
With
enactment of the North Korean Human Rights Act (Japan)
as a goal, we strengthened our ties with other NGOs concerned
with human rights in North Korea.
The
partnerships we forged with groups concerned with the issue
of Japanese nationals abducted by North Korea broke new
ground. These groups include the Society to Help Returnees
to North Korea (HRNK), the National Association for the
Rescue of Japanese Kidnapped by North Korea (NARKN), the
Association of Families of Those Abducted by North Korea,
the Investigative Commission on Missing Japanese Probably
Related to North Korea, and the Association of Lawyers
for the Protection of the Human Rights of Abductees to
North Korea. Working together with these groups and cooperating
on points of common concern contributed to the passing
of the North Korean Human Rights Act in Japan. |
VIII. |
Strengthening
Relationships and Cooperation with International NGOs |
|
International
cooperation among those seeking to protect North Korean
refugees and assist them in reaching a third country is
vital. This year we also made progress in this area.
Korean-American
pastor Phillip Jun Buck was released from prison and deported
from China in August of this year.
However,
Choi Yong-hun, who was involved in the 2003 Boat People
incident, remains imprisoned even though he has already
served more than two-thirds of his 5-year prison term.
Increased cooperation is necessary to resolve this case. |
|
A. |
Expanding
capabilities |
|
|
This
year we were able to respond to an increasing number of requests
to participate in seminars and meetings. Additionally, through
our English homepage we have been able to recruit interns,
who we expect will play an increasingly important role in
our organization. As the human talent available to us expands
to include those fluent in Chinese and Korean, our capabilities
will grow accordingly. |
|
B. |
Increased
presence at international conferences |
|
|
As
international recognition of Life Funds for North Korean
Refugees grows, requests increase from prominent international
NGOs, as well as the U.S. government, to participate in symposia,
conferences, and hearings: |
|
|
• |
Participated
in Freedom House Conference (Belgium) |
|
|
• |
Participated
in EU public hearings |
|
|
• |
Participated
as panelist in symposium of Asia Foundation (New York) |
|
|
• |
Met
with the U.S. President and gave testimony at the public
hearing of the Committee of Religious Freedoms |
|
|
• |
Was
guest speaker at lunch symposium sponsored by Freedom House
(Washington) |
|
|
• |
Participated
in conference co-sponsored by the Rafto Foundation and Citizens’ Alliance
for North Korean Human Rights (Bergen, Norway) |
|
|
• |
Assisted
with the publication of “Are They Telling Us the Truth,” a
book detailing defectors’ testimonies, in Esperanto. |
IX. |
Seminars
and Workshops |
|
Our
regional activities in this area are still insufficient;
there is an obvious and real need for
further expansion. |
|
A. |
We
held a screening of the documentary “Seoul Train” featuring
defectors’ testimonies, in the Japanese cities of Osaka,
Sendai, Akita, and Tanabe (Wakayama Prefecture), and held
a lecture in Matsue City. |
|
B. |
With
the cooperation of NARKN, we made a presentation on the human
rights problems faced by North Korean refugees. |
|
C. |
We
held a meeting at the Mindan offices in Nagano Prefecture
to present testimony on the human rights abuses suffered
by North Koreans. |
|
|
|